|
Department of Justice
Implements Plan to Enact Hometown Heroes
Survivors Benefit Act
October 23, 2007 – The Department of Justice
unveiled a new strategy to streamline the
claim review process and address the backlog
issue related to the Hometown Heroes
Survivor Benefits Act at a recent hearing of
the Senate Judiciary Committee.
The Hometown Heroes Act of 2003 states that
the families of public safety officers who
suffer a fatal heart attack or stroke while
in the line of duty may qualify for survivor
benefits under the Public Safety Officers’
Benefits (PSOB) Program.
Families of three fallen firefighters
testified at the hearing, detailing the
difficulties they faced in attempting to
claim survivor benefits from the Department
of Justice (DOJ). The result: two denied
claims, one pending claim and a combined
five years of delay.
In a statement issued at the hearing,
Domingo Herraiz, Director of the Bureau of
Justice Assistance which administers the
PSOB program, vowed, “We have taken and will
continue to take steps to decrease the time
it takes for survivors to be given an answer
on their claims.” Those steps include
additional PSOB staff, a case management
system that enables claimants to track the
status of their case, outreach to public
safety agencies and—most importantly—a plan
to expedite the claims process.
As of October 4th, DOJ reported 202 pending
cases, 21 approvals, 57 denials and 26
appeals. The department has been criticized
for major delays in processing claims and
for rulings that, in the words of Herraiz,
are “too restrictive.”
Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Chairman of
the Senate Judiciary Committee, stated that
the DOJ is “delaying implementation of the
law and disregarding the clear will of
Congress to grant surviving families death
benefits in a timely, fair manner.”
Herraiz recently addressed the semi-annual
meeting of CFSI’s National Advisory
Committee regarding the issue. “I am not
pleased with our progress over the last
year,” stated Herraiz, who admits that the
claim review process has taken longer than
expected. “It’s time for me to accept
responsibility. I can take charge of my
organization and I will fix it,” he
promises.
The department states that the initial
backlog is the result of a complete revision
of PSOB regulations following the
implementation of the Hometown Heroes Act.
The regulations were finalized in September
of last year. DOJ maintains that most claims
currently under review are waiting to
receive additional evidence from the agency
for which the public safety officer worked,
causing additional delay.
Herraiz calls the internal issues at the DOJ
a long-standing problem—one that he plans to
resolve. “You will see a big change. In
three months, I guarantee a difference with
the Hometown Heroes claims. We can do better
and we will do better.”
In an attempt to enact these changes, DOJ
released two
policy memorandums
relating to the processing of survivor
benefit claims. The memos, signed by
Director Herraiz, clarify the definitions of
two terms contained in the Hometown Heroes
Survivors Benefit Act of 2003.
The Hometown Heroes Act, which was
unanimously passed by both houses of
Congress and signed into law by President
Bush in December of 2003, stated:
“if a public safety officer dies as the
direct and proximate result of a heart
attack or stroke, that officer shall be
presumed to have died as the direct and
proximate result of a personal injury
sustained in the line of duty, if--
(1)
that officer, while on duty--
(A) engaged in a situation, and such engagement
involved
nonroutine stressful or strenuous
physical law enforcement,
fire suppression, rescue, hazardous material
response, emergency medical services, prison
security, disaster relief, or other
emergency response activity; or
(B) participated in a training exercise, and
such participation involved
nonroutine stressful or strenuous
physical activity…
(3) such presumption is not overcome by
competent medical evidence to the contrary.
The manner in which DOJ was defining the
term “nonroutine stressful or strenuous
physical activity” has caused some concern
among survivors and the public safety
community at large. In several cases, DOJ
has denied benefits to the survivors of
public safety officers who have died in the
line of duty from a heart attack or stroke
based at least in part on the assumption
that the emergency activities the officers
were undertaking were “routine” for a public
safety officer.
“I believe it is safe to say that any
firefighter or law enforcement officer will
tell you no emergency situation is ever
‘routine,’” stated Bill Webb, Executive
Director of the Congressional Fire Services
Institute. “Our nation’s public safety
officers put their lives on the line every
day. A situation which they may encounter
on a regular basis can quickly escalate into
a catastrophic situation. While the men and
women of our nation’s fire service are often
prepared for almost any situation, the
stress involved in their jobs is anything
but routine and can take an enormous toll
both physically and mentally.”
The new DOJ policy memorandum clarifies the
meaning of the term “nonroutine stressful or
strenuous activity” and specifically states
that “Responding to an emergency call shall
presumptively be treated as non-routine.”
Many survivors have also expressed concern
over how DOJ has implemented the phrase
“competent medical evidence to the contrary”
in past decisions. The Department has often
asked for as much as ten years of medical
records and some survivors have reported
infinite requests for more medical records
from DOJ staff. The new policy memorandum
clarifies that medical records shall only be
requested if the information provided in the
claim file suggests factors outside of the
line of duty may be responsible for the
heart attack or stroke. The memo further
clarifies that “medical-history records
requested of the claimant will be reviewed
for mitigating evidence in favor of the
claim.”
“While we believe this a positive
development in resolving this issue, there
is still more work to be done,” said Mr.
Webb. “It is now up to DOJ to implement the
new policy and to make it work. Too many
families have been left out in the cold
waiting for DOJ to do what Congress
unanimously intended for them to do. It is
imperative that fire service continue to
monitor the situation to make sure the
families of our public safety officers are
treated fairly and their claims are
processed efficiently and as Congress
intended.” |